Name of Feature/Request: inconsistent formatting for yes/no custom fields
What financial, time savings, or quality of life improvements will occur from this: Things to Consider:Suggested Alternative Solutions:Original Description:Screenshot of custom fields on the add new item screen in Striven Manufacturing
Screen Shot of Technical Specifications and Handling Compliances section on Custom Fields Set Up Screen
Attempted Solutions So Far: None Listed
Digging deep - Any additional Why behind this request / How was this accomplished before Striven in what system or software: Original Description: Screenshot of custom fields on the add new item screen in Striven Manufacturing
Screen Shot of Technical Specifications and Handling Compliances section on Custom Fields Set Up Screen
Screenshot of each custom field set-up detail
When these yes/no fields are reordered as shown below they blend into the list above of multi-select checkboxes from custom list.
This can create confusion and is not consistent with the way other custom field names are formatted
Making these custom names Bold so they stand out as custom field names and not just list options would prevent this confusion moving forward.
StrivenID: 4624674